Although most supporters of the amendment weren’t naive enough to believe that dirty Minnesota politics wouldn’t rear its ugly head in the funding allocation process, most probably believed that the shenanigans would start after funding allocation recommendations made their way to the Minnesota Legislature, not before.We were wrong. Political blackmail and reported political threats by two lawmakers on the 12 member Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council already have eroded the amendment’s well meaning intent and unfortunately, we’re only seeing the beginning.These shameless tactics by Rep. Rick Hansen, DFL South St. Paul, and Sen. Ellen Anderson, DFL St. Paul, are meant to keep as much of the funding in the Twin Cities metro areas possible. Dig deeper, and the political trail becomes even more interesting. For example, Hansen already has been involved with another underhanded tactic by supporting legislation that would directly detour amendment funds for uses other than voters intended as well.cheapnfljerseysonlinez http://www.cheapnfljerseysonlinez.top How in the name of Minnesota can Hansen even be allowed to stay on the council after that political stab in the back?It appears that the complete funding allocation process is going to be a long and nasty political fight to keep the funding where it was intended by Minnesotans who supported the amendment, that being to improve the natural state of the state as a whole based upon need, not geographical preference.On Monday, the council made its funding allocation recommendations. Now, those recommendations will go to the Legislature, and that is where the real fight probably will begin.Let’s roll up our sleeves and fight for what we know is right. I urge Minnesotans to call, e mail or write their legislators and governor, write letters, become involved in the legislative process and let our elected leaders know that we aren’t going to let dirty Minnesota politics ruin what we know is a good idea.Karry KylloEAST GRAND FORKS Around Minnesota today, many opponents of the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment probably are telling supporters, “I told you so.”And at this point, their comments may have some merit.Although most supporters of the amendment weren’t naive enough to believe that dirty Minnesota politics wouldn’t rear its ugly head in the funding allocation process, most probably believed that the shenanigans would start after funding allocation recommendations made their way to the Minnesota Legislature, not before.We were wrong. Political blackmail and reported political threats by two lawmakers on the 12 member Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council already have eroded the amendment’s well meaning intent and unfortunately, we’re only seeing the beginning.These shameless tactics by Rep. Rick Hansen, DFL South St. Paul, and Sen. Ellen Anderson, DFL St. Paul, are meant to keep as much of the funding in the Twin Cities metro areas possible. Dig deeper, and the political trail becomes even more interesting. For example, Hansen already has been involved with another underhanded tactic by supporting legislation that would directly detour amendment funds for uses other than voters intended as well.

Leave a Reply